skip to main content

Poll Reveals Shockingly Inadequate Earnings From Streaming

8 out of 10 music creators earn less than £200 a year from streaming, finds survey ahead of songwriters and artists giving evidence to a Select Committee of MPs.

Published: 07 December 2020 | 12:00 AM Updated: 28 April 2021 | 4:32 PM
Graphic image includes three brightly coloured squares, one with the text
These statistics show that music streaming does not play its part in supporting the careers of the vast majority of creators and artists on whose work it relies.

A poll by The Ivors Academy and Musicians’ Union has exposed the shockingly inadequate earnings the majority of music creators currently receive from streaming. The findings come ahead of the second meeting of the DCMS Select Committee inquiry into the economics of music streaming, on Tuesday 8 December.

The survey of the organisations’ members shows the reality of streaming income for writers, artists, musicians, songwriters and composers:

  • 82% of respondents earned less than £200 from streaming, from all of their music across all platforms in 2019. This included members with thousands, hundreds of thousands, and millions of streams.
  • 92% said less than 5% of their earnings came from streaming last year.
  • 50% said their income from recorded music has declined over the past 10 years.
  • 43% said that insufficient income from streaming caused them to get a job outside of music.

Second inquiry meeting on Tuesday 8 December

At the second meeting of the inquiry on 8 December, MPs will hear from Ivor Novello Award-winning songwriter and artist Nile Rodgers, songwriter and The Ivors Academy member Fiona Bevan, Jazz alto-saxophonist and The Ivors Academy member Soweto Kinch, manager and record producer Kwame Kwaten, Managing Director at Maria Forte Music Services Ltd Maria Forte and José Luis Sevillano Director General at the Society for Artists (AIE) in Spain.

The first meeting of the Select Committee inquiry heard from artists and performers Guy Garvey, Nadine Shah, Ed O’Brien and Tom Gray.

After the first meeting of the Select Committee inquiry the Chair, Julian Knight MP, expressed concern that some people were reluctant to speak to the inquiry, “because they fear action may be taken against them if they speak in public.”

Knight went on to say that “No-one should suffer any detriment for speaking to a Parliamentary Committee and anyone deliberately causing harm to one of our witnesses would be in danger of being in contempt of this House.”

We have to make the economics of streaming fairer

The Ivors Academy and the MU have been campaigning to Fix Streaming calling the royalties paid to music creators from streaming “woefully insufficient”. A campaign petition calling for a Government review received over 17,000 signatures.

Our Deputy General Secretary Naomi Pohl commented on the results,

“These statistics show that music streaming does not play its part in supporting the careers of the vast majority of creators and artists on whose work it relies. We have to make the economics of streaming fairer; improved deals for artists, a bigger share of revenue for songwriters and an income stream for the first time for non-featured musicians."

Graham Davies, CEO of The Ivors Academy said “This survey is further demonstration that the song and the songwriter are undervalued. Too much streaming money is going to the major labels, this is an outdated model and needs reform. We have the best songwriters in the world and they deserve more.”

Streaming is not sustainable

The Ivors Academy and the MU asked their members to provide comments about their experiences of streaming anonymously through the survey:

“I have written songs that have been prominently playlisted on streaming platforms … These songs have garnered millions of streams but generated next to no income for me as songwriter.”

“I appreciate that streaming is the future. But the earning potential [for creators] given the company value is not fair” songwriter and artist.

“[Streaming is] not sustainable and does in no way even return the investment I put into the recording, production or marketing of the songs” artist.

“Albums which cost tens of thousands of pounds - perhaps hundreds of thousands - to produce generate pitiful revenue from streaming platforms, so there's no incentive for […] independents like me to make records” songwriter.

Take action now

If you’ve got 5 minutes, email the DCMS Select Committee at cmscom@parliament.uk in support of the MU’s submission.

If you’re not sure what to say, here’s a template you can use as a starting point.

Remember to add how the economics of music streaming affect your personally – it could make all the difference.

If you’ve got a little more time give your own evidence to the inquiry via the DCMS Select Committee website, you can read our guide for some useful tips and ideas.

#FixStreaming news

General Secretary Naomi Pohl stands in discussion outside of the Royal Opera House

2023 End of Year Round Up

MU General Secretary Naomi Pohl reports back on the work that the Union has done through 2023, as well as setting out some of MU’s intentions for 2024, and more general food for thought about the music industry.

Published: 30 December 2023

Read more about 2023 End of Year Round Up
Naomi Pohl and the UK Music Delegation outside 10 Downing Street this week to discuss the impact of AI on the music industry.

MU General Secretary Summer Update

MU General Secretary Naomi Pohl looks at your rights and AI, developments in the Fix Streaming campaign, and how we’re negotiating the best rates for members.

Published: 07 September 2023

Read more about MU General Secretary Summer Update
#FixStreaming

Take urgent action to fix streaming

Ask your MP to put the value of music back where it belongs – in your hands

Take urgent action to fix streaming